The Anatomy of Bullying in the Workplace

How Groupthink and Shared Psychotic Disorder Play a Role  

Bullying isn’t just a schoolyard issue; it exists in boardrooms, offices, and workplaces across industries. Workplace bullying not only affects individual employees but also contributes to a toxic organizational culture. What exacerbates this behavior is collective dynamics, where groupthink and shared psychotic disorder (also known as folie à deux or shared delusional disorder) play significant roles. Understanding these psychological phenomena is critical for identifying, addressing, and ultimately preventing workplace bullying.

This article examines the anatomy of workplace bullying, explores how group dynamics and psychological factors influence it, and provides actionable steps for creating a healthier, more inclusive work environment.

Understanding Workplace Bullying and Its Prevalence

Workplace bullying refers to repeated, unwanted, and harmful behavior directed toward an individual or group. It can take the form of verbal abuse, social exclusion, undermining someone’s work, or more covert, passive-aggressive behaviors.

Prevalence and Impact  

The statistics are alarming. According to the Workplace Bullying Institute (WBI), approximately 30% of employees have experienced bullying at work, while another 20% have witnessed it. The effects go beyond employee morale; bullying leads to reduced productivity, increased absenteeism, and, in some cases, severe mental and physical health issues for victims.

However, bullying doesn’t happen in a vacuum—it often thrives in environments where group dynamics enable or amplify the behavior.

How Groupthink Enables Workplace Bullying  

Coined by social psychologist Irving Janis, groupthink occurs when the desire for unanimity within a group overrides critical thinking. This is particularly destructive in workplace settings, where employees feel pressured to conform to the dominant group culture—even at the expense of their own judgment.

The Mechanics of Groupthink in Bullying:

  1. Pressure to Conform

When an influential colleague or leader acts as a bully, others may join in or stay silent to avoid becoming targets themselves. Peer pressure within the group discourages dissent, perpetuating the toxic behavior.  

  1. Dehumanization of Victims

Groupthink often leads to rationalization or justification of the bullying behavior. Over time, the group may come to see the target as deserving of mistreatment, further feeding the cycle.  

  1. Suppressing Dissent

Employees who do not agree with the bullying behavior may suppress their opinions out of fear of retaliation, leading to a lack of accountability.  

For example, a team might collectively ignore a colleague’s contributions, following the lead of someone in authority, not because they agree, but to “go along to get along.” These dynamics create a fertile ground for bullying.

The Psychology Behind Shared Psychotic Disorder in Workplace Bullying  

Shared psychotic disorder, also known as folie à deux, occurs when one person transfers their distorted beliefs or delusions to another, often within the context of a close relationship. While typically associated with clinical settings, parallels can be drawn to workplace dynamics in bullying situations.  

How It Relates to Workplace Bullying:

  1. Charismatic Leaders Spreading Toxic Narratives

Bullying in the workplace often starts with one dominant individual, whose opinions and negative perceptions are adopted by others. For instance, a manager’s disdain for an employee may create a ripple effect where others follow suit.  

  1. Reinforcement Through Echo Chambers

When close-knit teams become insular, they can unintentionally validate and perpetuate toxic behavior. This mutual validation traps individuals in a cycle of shared negativity.

  1. Collective Justification

Shared psychotic disorder moves beyond simple agreement; it creates a self-reinforcing narrative where group members genuinely believe the victim is the problem.  

A vivid example would be when an organization labels a particular employee as “difficult” based on one leader’s unsubstantiated criticisms. This belief then spreads, making the employee an easy target for hostility and ostracism.

Real-Life Case Studies  

Exploring real-world scenarios helps illustrate these dynamics. Here are two examples that highlight both groupthink and aspects of shared psychotic behavior in workplace bullying. The name of the individuals and firms have been intentionally omitted.

Case Study 1: The Isolated Employee  

A junior manager at a tech company began spreading rumors about a coworker, claiming they were incompetent. Rather than verify the claims, team members began excluding the targeted employee from meetings and work chats. Over time, even the victim’s contributions were labeled insufficient, regardless of their quality. Groupthink allowed an unfounded narrative to become “truth.”  

Case Study 2: A Clique vs. the Newcomer  

At a design firm, a small clique of long-term employees targeted a new hire, refusing to share resources and coordinating to ensure the hire failed assignments. Their collective actions largely stemmed from loyalty to a superior who viewed the hire as a threat to their position. This mindset spread through group validation, mirroring shared psychotic tendencies.

Legal and Ethical Considerations  

Employers have both legal and ethical responsibilities when it comes to addressing workplace bullying. Failure to act can lead to lawsuits, damaged reputations, and a toxic organizational culture.  

Legal Implications  

While laws vary by region, employers may be held accountable for not adequately preventing or addressing bullying behavior under workplace harassment or occupational safety regulations.  

Ethical Implications  

Beyond legalities, organizations must foster trust and inclusivity. Turning a blind eye rewards toxic behavior and diminishes employee well-being, eroding the company’s values.

Strategies for Prevention and Intervention  

Proactively addressing bullying requires both individual and organizational efforts. Below are strategies for creating a safe and inclusive environment.  

For Employees

  • Document Incidents: Keep a record of specific behaviors, dates, and witnesses to aid in reporting bullying effectively.
  • Build Alliances: Seek out allies in your workplace who share your concerns and can offer support.

For Organizations  

  • Foster an Open Culture: Encourage employees to voice concerns without fear of retaliation by implementing anonymous reporting mechanisms.
  • Training Programs: Educate managers and staff on recognizing and responding to workplace bullying dynamics, particularly groupthink and shared psychotic behaviors.
  • Set Clear Policies: Ensure your workplace has anti-bullying policies that outline zero tolerance and the steps for resolving complaints.
  • Intervene Swiftly: Prompt action sends a clear message that bullying behaviors will not be tolerated.

Creating a Healthier Workplace  

Workplace bullying thrives when organizations fail to address the psychological and cultural factors that sustain it. By understanding the role of groupthink and shared psychotic disorder in enabling and perpetuating bullying, employers can take proactive measures to foster healthier, more supportive environments.  

Creating change begins with awareness, and from awareness grows action. Organizations and employees must work together to prioritize respect, accountability, and inclusivity. If your workplace could benefit from resources or training on bullying prevention, don’t hesitate to seek professional guidance. The effort you put in now could make all the difference—for your employees and your business.  

Receive the latest news about Leadership, Agility and Emotional Intelligence.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Recent Posts
The Three Cs of Team Success
Neurodiversity Drives Optimal Outcomes For Agile Teams
Why Honesty Is the Secret Ingredient to Successful Teams
Say Goodbye to Urgency Culture